Gruber's Shortest SAT Test Answer Guide
Article Index
Gruber's Shortest SAT Test Answer Guide
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19

 

Writing

Find out which writing techniques you need to study to improve your score.  Try to complete this section in 1 minute.

Indentifying Sentence Errors:
1) Which part (A, B, C, or D) in the below sentence is incorrect? Choose E if there is no error.
If any signer of the Constitution (A) was to return to life (B) for a day, his opinion (C) of our amendments (D) would be interesting.

A)You are right. "If any signer of the Constitution were to return to life…" is correct. The verb in the "if clause" of a present contrary-to-fact conditional statement must have a past subjunctive form (were). See Grammar and Usage Refresher 9d, p. 497.

(B) This part is correct. The part (A) is incorrect. "If any signer of the Constitution were to return to life…" is correct. The verb in the "if clause" of a present contrary-to-fact conditional statement must have a past subjunctive form (were). See Grammar and Usage Refresher 9d, p. 497.

C) This part is correct. The part (A) is incorrect. "If any signer of the Constitution were to return to life…" is correct. The verb in the "if clause" of a present contrary-to-fact conditional statement must have a past subjunctive form (were). See Grammar and Usage Refresher 9d, p. 497.

D) This part is correct. The part (A) is incorrect. "If any signer of the Constitution were to return to life…" is correct. The verb in the "if clause" of a present contrary-to-fact conditional statement must have a past subjunctive form (were). See Grammar and Usage Refresher 9d, p. 497.

E) No. Part (A) is incorrect. "If any signer of the Constitution were to return to life…" is correct. The verb in the "if clause" of a present contrary-to-fact conditional statement must have a past subjunctive form (were). See Grammar and Usage Refresher 9d, p. 497.